Tortoisehg workbench merging taking long time

#TORTOISEHG WORKBENCH MERGING TAKING LONG TIME HOW TO#
#TORTOISEHG WORKBENCH MERGING TAKING LONG TIME CODE#
#TORTOISEHG WORKBENCH MERGING TAKING LONG TIME FREE#
#TORTOISEHG WORKBENCH MERGING TAKING LONG TIME WINDOWS#

Use this one, learn the command line, it's brilliant So I spent some time with a few version control systems (VCS) trying to pick one and thought I'd share my experiences since for a beginner it can be a quite daunting idea to just pick one and run with it - after all you're on a steep learning curve already, why would you want to double your headache with learning a VCS at the same time? Though that's often the type of advice you get:

Hopefully, it's not the result of a disaster (that's sort of almost what happened for me, fortunately I spotted it coming in the nick of time) and I've since discovered a whole bunch of other good reasons to use version control. If that describes you then read on, hopefully this will help you choose a Version Control System for yourself and whilst I can't guarantee it'll make your life better, if you find one that does indeed 'work for you', then it won't make it harder and I'd wager a decent bet that you'll find benefits you weren't even looking for!ДЄs a beginner, I would guess it's pretty common to not even think about version control for quite a while after you start (or in my case, begin again), but at some point, it's likely to come to you - that sudden realisation that your life would be easier if you could keep track of the various changes going on in your code.

I think I might want to try version control.

For short term projects where you don't really need long term history it's more productive. Personally I use Dropbox when my collaborators are not familiar with version control. Disadvantage: you can't see at a glance what exactly was changed it'll only tell you which file was changed, but not which part of the file. This will make sharing the documents much easier (no need for email any more), it's very user friendly, and you have the option to revert to previous versions (for up to 30 days, I think). Perhaps it's simpler to just use a shared Dropbox folder. Using any kind of version control will require people to learn a bit about it. I think this will be manageable for your collaborators. However, there will still be a learning curve. This will make it easy to keep track of changes, see what has been changed precisely and who has changed it, or to go back to previous revisions.

#TORTOISEHG WORKBENCH MERGING TAKING LONG TIME WINDOWS#

Use TortoiseHg which has support for Mathematica out of the box on Windows (not on other operating systems). I do not recommend using the Workbench for version control (there are many plugins, but they're not user friendly enough and they don't support Mathematica specifically). I recommend that you use Mercurial (Hg) and use BitBucket or a similar service to synchronize your repositories. BitBucket is nice and offers public repositories with many users or private repositories with no more than 5 users.

#TORTOISEHG WORKBENCH MERGING TAKING LONG TIME FREE#

Of SVN and Hg I suggest Hg because there are free and popular services that give you Hg hosting, so you can synchronize your repositories. The Git tools are generally less user friendly on Windows and as far as I know they didn't borrow the Mathematica diffing tools from TortoiseSVN.

#TORTOISEHG WORKBENCH MERGING TAKING LONG TIME CODE#

ToirtoiseHg has borrowed the same code from TortoiseSVN.

#TORTOISEHG WORKBENCH MERGING TAKING LONG TIME HOW TO#

Such tools do exist: TortoiseSVN for Windows knows how to diff Mathematica notebooks out of the box-no setup needed.

So I recommend that you use version control tools which already support Mathematica's diffing tools out of the box. To use these tools manually is too much trouble, and to set them up to work with a version control system is again not user friendly. There are tools that make it possible to diff two Mathematica notebook graphically: the old AuthorTools` package and the NotebookTools`NotebookDiff function which is included by default (no packages needed) and seems to do exactly the same as AuthorTools. They will not make it possible for you to compare two Mathematica notebook and see what has changed in a human readable way, so you would lose the main benefit. However, I do not recommend that you use Workbench for this because the tools available for it (eclipse plugins) will not be friendly to Mathematica notebooks. The main reason is that it will make it easy to keep track of who changed exactly what. Using version control may be beneficial for your project. m files), so it's more difficult to effectively diff them. This is my personal opinion, taking into consideration that you need an easy to learn solution and that you are working with documentation notebooks and not plain code (.

Tortoisehg workbench merging taking long time